Article Item

Troubleshooting for Intrathecal Therapy

Dec 2, 2018

Salim Hayek, MD, PhD
neuromodulation spinal cord stimulation

By Salim Hayek, MD, PhD
Professor, Department of Anesthesiology
Chief, Division of Pain Medicine
University Hospitals of Cleveland
Cleveland, OH

 

Background

Physicians involved in intrathecal therapy must be knowledgeable in identifying and managing potential intrathecal drug delivery system (IDDS) problems. Catheter-related problems represent the majority of system-related issues. These include catheter tip migration, kink or block; fracture of catheter; and inadvertent puncture or loosening of connections.[1] It should be noted that improvements have been made in catheter and related accessories design. However, it is not known if these improvements will translate into lesser hardware complications.

A lesser cause of IDDS malfunction involves pump motor stall.[2] This complication is readily revealed upon interrogation of the pump and rarely by performing a rotor study under fluoroscopy. Motor stalls occur temporarily following an MRI, and pumps should be routinely interrogated after MRI imaging. Prolonged motor stall following MRI is exceedingly rare.[3,4] However, the majority of pump motor stalls occur spontaneously, at a rate of 2.4% with FDA-approved drug monotherapy and 7% with off-label medication at 78 months after implant.

 

Best Practice

Sudden interruption of intrathecal medication infusion can result in serious adverse effects. This is especially concerning with baclofen withdrawal, which may be life threatening and sometimes fatal. Clonidine and opioid withdrawal can result in serious morbidity and occasional mortality. Hence, it is important to expeditiously diagnose IDDS dysfunction resulting in intrathecal infusion interruption and to understand the urgency for intervention depending on medications used. Of note, sudden interruption of ziconotide or bupivacaine infusion does not result in withdrawal.

Diagnosing interruption in intrathecal infusion in a timely fashion is essential to ensuring an optimal outcome. If pump interrogation reveals motor stall, imminent pump replacement may be necessary. Given apparently functioning pump, investigation of catheter function is warranted. This may be done by imaging or special catheter function studies.

  • Imaging studies such as X-ray or CT scan may be of low yield. However, they may be important in delineating catheter tip position and occasionally diagnosing catheter interruption or fracture.
  • Radioisotope studies may reveal catheter malfunction. However, they are not as timely or as specific as a catheter contrast agent study (also known as pump-o-gram).
  • In this test (pump-o-gram), the catheter access port is accessed with a proper size/type needle. Aspiration is attempted first:
    • If cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is obtained upon aspiration (> 0.3 ml), then the catheter system may be uninterrupted and it may be safe to inject contrast.
    • If CSF is not aspirated, then it is important to consider a number of parameters before deciding whether it is safe or not to inject the contrast. It may be prudent, while consenting the patient for a pump-o-gram, to explain that admission to the hospital may be needed. Prior to considering injecting the intrathecal catheter with contrast, it is essential to take into consideration the patient’s clinical status and previous exposure to the pump medications, the dead space within the catheter, the type of medication in the pump/catheter, and, hence, the amount of medication present in the catheter. Based on that information, the patient may need to be admitted and observed/supported.[5,6]

 

References

  1. ^ Varhabhatla NC, Zuo Z. Rising complication rates after intrathecal catheter and pump placement in the pediatric population: analysis of national data between 1997 and 2006. Pain physician. 2012;15:65-74.
  2. ^ Riordan J, Murphy P. Intrathecal Pump: An Abrupt Intermittent Pump Failure. Neuromodulation: journal of the International Neuromodulation Society. 2015;18:433-5.
  3. Kosturakis A, Gebhardt R. SynchroMed II intrathecal pump memory errors due to repeated magnetic resonance imaging. Pain physician. 2012;15:475-7.
  4. Diehn FE, Wood CP, Watson RE, Jr., Mauck WD, Burke MM, Hunt CH. Clinical safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with implanted SynchroMed EL infusion pumps. Neuroradiology. 2011;53:117-22.
  5. Dvorak EM, McGuire JR, Nelson ME. Incidence and identification of intrathecal baclofen catheter malfunction. PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation. 2010;2:751-6.
  6. Miracle AC, Fox MA, Ayyangar RN, Vyas A, Mukherji SK, Quint DJ. Imaging evaluation of intrathecal baclofen pump-catheter systems. AJNR American journal of neuroradiology. 2011;32:1158-64.

 

Download PDF.

Close Nav